Peter Jackson Responds to New Line Nastiness

by | January 12, 2007 | Comments

Just yesterday we reported that New Line chief Bob Shaye was, like, reallllllly mad at Peter Jackson, and also that he pretty much blacklisted the filmmaker from ever darkening the NL doors again. Less than 24 hours later, we have a response from Mr. Jackson.

As is often the case, Peter Jackson communicates to the internetted world by way of AICN. Here’s exactly (and completely) what the man had to say: "Our issue with New Line Cinema has only ever been about their refusal to account for financial anomalies that surfaced from a partial audit of The Fellowship of the Ring. Contrary to recent comments made by Bob Shaye, we attempted to discuss the issues raised by the Fellowship audit with New Line for over a year but the studio was and continues to be completely uncooperative. This has compelled us to file a lawsuit to pursue our contractual rights under the law. Nobody likes taking legal action, but the studio left us with no alternative.

For over two years, New Line has denied us the ability to audit The Two Towers and The Return of the King, despite repeated requests. Film auditing is a common and straightforward practice within the industry and we don’t understand why New Line Cinema has taken this position.

In light of these circumstances, I didn’t think it was appropriate for me to be involved in New Line Cinema’s 40th Anniversary video. I have never discussed this video with any of the cast of The Lord of the Rings. The issues that Bob Shaye has with the cast pre-date this law suit by many years.

Fundamentally, our legal action is about holding New Line to it’s contractual obligations and promises. It is regrettable that Bob has chosen to make it personal. I have always had the highest respect and affection for Bob and other senior management at New Line and continue to do so."

Kinda makes one wonder why Shaye would have gone public with this sort of stuff in the first place. I mean, it sure does make for some pretty juicy reading, but don’t these types of battles generally take place behind closed doors? Do these mega-rich movie-makers actually CARE what we think about broken promises, hurt feelings and unfinished audits?

All I know is I want a "Hobbit" movie. If Peter Jackson can’t direct it, I say give the thing to Terry Gilliam. Who’s with me?

Tag Cloud

sports cinemax CBS All Access TBS Cartoon Network biography Election FXX Countdown History Watching Series Nominations SDCC APB ITV TCA 2017 American Society of Cinematographers Nat Geo AMC Reality Podcast Rom-Com CMT dramedy Fox News Awards Extras TruTV IFC TCA Photos period drama harry potter Trailer X-Men Interview Horror Opinion Teen CBS BET TV Land Oscars Biopics MSNBC vampires Fall TV Box Office politics cooking PaleyFest Amazon 24 frames Adult Swim Pirates serial killer technology Marathons WGN 2016 Reality Competition Polls and Games ESPN VH1 Trivia Logo Schedule TIFF Lifetime 2015 Freeform Musicals Set visit Winners NBC Ghostbusters discovery Comedy Calendar Mystery Lionsgate ABC OWN Music travel Hulu sitcom Valentine's Day First Look crime thriller HBO USA RT History The CW Comedy Central Country Winter TV MTV Kids & Family Universal crime drama Holidays Syfy Exclusive Video GIFs Tomatazos CNN SundanceTV Super Bowl Action Star Trek Spring TV diversity Disney Channel El Rey social media singing competition adventure A&E FOX Summer boxoffice Masterpiece LGBTQ Character Guide ABC Family TCM Netflix Superheroes TNT Martial Arts Animation Tumblr Rock Red Carpet Marvel police drama Starz Star Wars war PBS DirecTV science fiction Grammys Drama GLAAD Showtime Thanksgiving Certified Fresh Sundance Emmys Pop Best and Worst Infographic BBC NYCC cops Sneak Peek 007 Cosplay FX DC Comics Sci-Fi thriller Year in Review TV VICE GoT Rocky President Fantasy Disney 2017 aliens Nickelodeon Toys Food Network E! Premiere Dates Crackle Bravo Comic Book Esquire BBC America Writers Guild of America docudrama comiccon Video Games Mary Tyler Moore